Devplan raises $2.5M to turn customer feedback into shipped features. Read more on GeekWire.

ProductFeedback to feature

Turn customer feedback into shipped features.

The AI-native way to run product development: projects suggested from evidence, specs written, work tracked, risks flagged.

What changes for you

Ship what customers pay for, sooner.

Revenue

Ship what deals are waiting on

Requests sit in calls and tickets while deals wait.Top requests ranked, specced and shipped; customers told the day it lands.

Time back

No status reports, no chasing

Status meetings and hand-written updates every week.Status comes from real work, for every team.

Right first time

Less rework

Specs written from memory, then rebuilt.Specs grounded in code and customer evidence.

Fewer interruptions

Answers without an engineer

Every question pulls in an engineer or a founder.Sales, support and new hires ask Weaver first.

90% of a new hire's product questions answered without a founder at Tato (Tato's estimate)

How each step works

Everything between “a customer asked” and “it shipped”.

Legacy project tools wait for people to update tickets. Devplan does the admin, so your team spends its time on judgment calls.

01 · HearRequests found for you

Build what customers are asking for

Scattered feedback becomes evidence-backed project proposals.

→ Revenue

02 · RankRanked by demand

Bet on the right things

Every project ranked by customer demand, impact and effort.

→ Right first time

03 · SpecSpec creation

Specs grounded in facts

PRDs and tech specs from your code and customer evidence.

→ Right first time

03 · SpecEstimation

Know the cost before you commit

Work sized from real code context, so plans hold up.

→ Right first time

04 · BuildTicket sync

Plugs into how you work today

Fully formed tickets in your existing tools. Nothing to migrate.

→ Time back

04 · BuildAI agents, with you in charge

Hand work to AI agents, keep control

Orchestrate and oversee AI agents across delivery.

→ Time back

05 · TrackAutomated tracking · Project risks

Tracking that runs itself. Trouble spotted early.

Status from real work, so nobody writes reports. Risk scoring flags slips and blockers while there's time to act.

→ Time back

PRDs and specs

A PRD where every line has a source.

Devplan writes the PRD from customer evidence and your code. Every claim links to the call, ticket or file it came from.

PRD · Slack integration● Ready to build

Send project alerts to Slack

Problem

Teams miss project updates because alerts only arrive by email. 17 customers asked for Slack alerts this quarter1, and 3 open deals list it as a requirement2.

Requirements

  • Post risk and status alerts to a channel the team chooses.
  • Reuse the existing notifier service3 rather than building a new one.
  • Let admins set alert frequency.

Estimate

Medium: 2 services touched, 6 to 8 days4

1

9 calls · 8 tickets

“We live in Slack. Can alerts go there?” and 16 more

2

Slack · #sales

Three deals waiting on a Slack integration

3

GitHub

notifier/slack.ts already posts webhooks

4

Code context

Sized from the services and files the change touches

Get the free PRD template →

Works with your AI coding tools

Works with Claude Code, Cursor and Codex.

Your AI coding tools read the spec and the customer evidence from Devplan, so they build the right thing.

  • Connects through MCP in a few steps. Setup guide
  • Or send the same spec to Jira or Linear
Claude CodeCursorCodex
~/app · claude-code · devplan mcp

Customer stories

Teams that ship what customers ask for.

See all stories

Build or buy

Build it with Claude, or use Devplan?

You can wire Claude to a few tools. Here's what it takes for a whole team.

Build it yourselfDevplan
Getting startedWeeks of engineeringConnect in minutes
MemoryStarts from scratch each sessionKeeps the history, with sources
Everyone sees the same thingDepends on who set it upOne shared picture for the team
Permissions and securityYou build and audit itBuilt in, from your tools
Specs, tickets and trackingSeparate workIncluded
Connector upkeepYour engineers, foreverManaged for you
CostEngineering time plus model usageCredits, no per-seat charge

Connect your first tools in minutes

Code takes about 30 minutes for the first pass. Other sources fill in over hours and days.

Secure by default

SOC 2 Type 2. Encrypted in transit and at rest, and never used to train Devplan or third-party models.

Start free, no credit card

$100 in free credits for 3 months. One shared credit pool, no per-seat charge.

Questions

Feedback to feature, answered

What is a PRD?

A product requirements document (PRD) describes what a feature should do, who it is for and why it matters, so a team can build it. A good PRD covers the problem with its evidence, the requirements, what is out of scope and how success is measured. Devplan writes PRDs from real customer evidence and your code, with every claim linked to its source.

How do I use Claude to turn customer feedback into a PRD?

Devplan does it without the copy-paste. Pasting feedback into Claude only covers what you paste; Devplan reads feedback across calls, tickets and Slack, groups it, and drafts the PRD grounded in your code, with every line linked to its source. Claude Code can then read that PRD through MCP. For a manual start, use the free PRD template.

How do I use Claude Code as a product manager to write specs and tickets?

Devplan gives Claude Code the product context a PM would otherwise paste in. Connect Devplan through MCP and Claude Code can read the customer evidence, past decisions and the spec. Devplan drafts the spec from that evidence and creates fully formed tickets in Jira or Linear, so the PM reviews instead of writing from scratch.

How do I automatically group and prioritize feature requests from tickets and Slack?

Devplan groups feature requests from Jira or Linear tickets, Slack threads and call notes into project proposals automatically, and ranks them by customer demand, impact and effort. Each score shows the evidence behind it, so roadmap debates start from data rather than the loudest voice in the room.

What results do teams see with Devplan?

Devplan teams spend less time on status and specs and more on judgment calls. Tato, for example, estimates that 90% of a new hire's product questions get a useful answer from Devplan without involving a founder, and it drafts customer-specific release updates every week from what shipped.

Do we have to leave Jira or Linear?

No, but you can: Devplan can replace Jira or Linear, with your roadmap, backlog, specs, tickets and tracking in one place. Or run it on top of the tool you already have, with specs becoming tickets there and status flowing back from real work. Many teams move over one project at a time.

Can Devplan replace Jira or Linear?

Yes. Devplan can run your roadmap, backlog, specs, tickets, tracking and risk alerts, so you don't need a separate tracker. It doesn't do release and version management yet, so teams that rely on it keep Jira or Linear just for releases.

Can AI coding agents build from Devplan specs?

Yes. Through MCP, Claude Code, Cursor and Codex read the spec, the customer evidence and past decisions from Devplan, so the code does what was intended. Devplan's product brain keeps that context current.

Build what customers actually asked for.

Connect your tools in minutes. $100 in free credits, no credit card.